Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs CSGCX
CLBFX vs CSGCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs CSGCX
CLBFX vs CSGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. CSGCX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and CSGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. CSGCX (1.49B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than CSGCX: CLBFX (1.92) vs CSGCX (0.63). CLBFX was incepted earlier than CSGCX: CLBFX (24 years) vs CSGCX (32 years). CSGCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CSGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 164.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSGCX: CLBFX (250) vs CSGCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.12 vs. CSGCX (9.24). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.63 vs. CSGCX (20.54).
| CLBFX | CSGCX | CLBFX / CSGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.65 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.65 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.827 | 3.540 | 278% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.49B | 19,342% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.63 | 304% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | 9.24 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.56 | 32.58 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.63 | 20.54 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.19 | 71.28 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement