Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs DBALX
CLBFX vs DBALX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs DBALX
CLBFX vs DBALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. DBALX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and DBALX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. DBALX (284M). DBALX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: DBALX (2.48) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than DBALX: CLBFX (24 years) vs DBALX (10 years). DBALX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. DBALX (25.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than DBALX: CLBFX (250) vs DBALX (5000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. DBALX (6.96). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. DBALX (13.99).
| CLBFX | DBALX | CLBFX / DBALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.93 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 3.035 | 322% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 284M | 98,239% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.48 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 6.96 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 24.74 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 13.99 | 273% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 60.92 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement