Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FASMX
CLBFX vs FASMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FASMX
CLBFX vs FASMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FASMX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FASMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FASMX (10.9B). FASMX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: FASMX (2.15) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FASMX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FASMX (37 years). CLBFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.56). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FASMX (25.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FASMX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.52 vs. FASMX (11.67). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. FASMX (17.32).
| CLBFX | FASMX | CLBFX / FASMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.53 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.56 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.985 | 6.781 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 10.9B | 2,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.15 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.52 | 11.67 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.58 | 32.75 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.24 | 17.32 | 203% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.00 | 65.44 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement