Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FBAKX
CLBFX vs FBAKX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FBAKX
CLBFX vs FBAKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FBAKX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FBAKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBAKX (65.8B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FBAKX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FBAKX (1.59). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FBAKX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FBAKX (18 years). CLBFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FBAKX (0.39). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBAKX (41.00). FBAKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FBAKX (0) vs CLBFX (250). FBAKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.34 vs. CLBFX (16.85). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. FBAKX (23.10).
| CLBFX | FBAKX | CLBFX / FBAKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.39 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.39 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 10.247 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 65.8B | 438% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.85 | 19.34 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 45.53 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.93 | 23.10 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.85 | 89.23 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers