Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FBALX
CLBFX vs FBALX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FBALX
CLBFX vs FBALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FBALX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and FBALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FBALX (66B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FBALX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FBALX (1.55). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FBALX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FBALX (40 years). CLBFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FBALX (0.46). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBALX (41.00). FBALX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FBALX (0) vs CLBFX (250). FBALX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.98 vs. CLBFX (12.47). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.21 vs. FBALX (20.10).
| CLBFX | FBALX | CLBFX / FBALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.46 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.46 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.964 | 9.799 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 66B | 436% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.55 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.47 | 14.98 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.39 | 44.04 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.21 | 20.10 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.55 | 81.08 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers