Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FBFRX
CLBFX vs FBFRX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FBFRX
CLBFX vs FBFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FBFRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FBFRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FBFRX (3.46B). FBFRX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: FBFRX (4.56) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FBFRX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FBFRX (13 years). CLBFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FBFRX (0.59). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBFRX (42.27). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBFRX: CLBFX (250) vs FBFRX (1000000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. FBFRX (15.50). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. FBFRX (22.14).
| CLBFX | FBFRX | CLBFX / FBFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.59 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.59 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 6.360 | 154% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 3.46B | 8,064% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 4.56 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 15.50 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 29.61 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 22.14 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 64.23 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement