Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FBMCX
CLBFX vs FBMCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FBMCX
CLBFX vs FBMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FBMCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FBMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FBMCX (3.46B). FBMCX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: FBMCX (3.57) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FBMCX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FBMCX (20 years). FBMCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBMCX (42.27). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBMCX: CLBFX (250) vs FBMCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. FBMCX (14.29). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. FBMCX (16.65).
| CLBFX | FBMCX | CLBFX / FBMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.66 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.66 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 5.890 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 3.46B | 8,064% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 3.57 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 14.29 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 25.48 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 16.65 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 51.21 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement