Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FCISX
CLBFX vs FCISX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FCISX
CLBFX vs FCISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FCISX commentary
Jul 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and FCISX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FCISX (79.7B). FCISX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: FCISX (4.65) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FCISX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FCISX (31 years). FCISX (1.11) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: CLBFX (250) vs FCISX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.93 vs. FCISX (10.34). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.42 vs. FCISX (28.63).
| CLBFX | FCISX | CLBFX / FCISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.11 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.964 | 5.197 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 79.7B | 361% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 4.65 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.93 | 10.34 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.31 | 30.38 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 28.63 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.55 | 78.44 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement