Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FFCMX
CLBFX vs FFCMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FFCMX
CLBFX vs FFCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FFCMX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FFCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFCMX (10.9B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FFCMX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FFCMX (1.22). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FFCMX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FFCMX (20 years). FFCMX (1.60) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFCMX (25.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FFCMX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.93 vs. FFCMX (9.59). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.42 vs. FFCMX (12.03).
| CLBFX | FFCMX | CLBFX / FFCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.57 | 42% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.60 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.964 | 7.872 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 10.9B | 2,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.22 | 157% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.93 | 9.59 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.31 | 29.19 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.42 | 12.03 | 303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.55 | 51.85 | 192% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers