Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FKINX
CLBFX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FKINX
CLBFX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FKINX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FKINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FKINX (79.8B). FKINX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: FKINX (5.18) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FKINX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FKINX (78 years). CLBFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.61). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: CLBFX (250) vs FKINX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. FKINX (14.43). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. FKINX (30.84).
| CLBFX | FKINX | CLBFX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.61 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.61 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 5.157 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 79.8B | 350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 5.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 14.43 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 33.74 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 30.84 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 88.35 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement