Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FKINX
CLBFX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FKINX
CLBFX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FKINX commentary
Jun 30, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FKINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FKINX (79.4B). FKINX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: FKINX (5.18) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FKINX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FKINX (78 years). CLBFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.61). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: CLBFX (250) vs FKINX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.52 vs. FKINX (11.62). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.30 vs. FKINX (31.89).
| CLBFX | FKINX | CLBFX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.61 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.61 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.964 | 4.746 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 79.4B | 363% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 5.18 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.52 | 11.62 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.31 | 32.05 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.30 | 31.89 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.55 | 85.38 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement