Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FOBAX
CLBFX vs FOBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FOBAX
CLBFX vs FOBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FOBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FOBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FOBAX (82.5M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FOBAX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FOBAX (1.20). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FOBAX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FOBAX (30 years). FOBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBAX (22.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: CLBFX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. FOBAX (4.74). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. FOBAX (6.52).
| CLBFX | FOBAX | CLBFX / FOBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.91 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.32 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 3.629 | 270% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 82.5M | 338,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.20 | 160% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 4.74 | 378% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 19.04 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 6.52 | 586% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 34.62 | 294% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement