Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FPKFX
CLBFX vs FPKFX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FPKFX
CLBFX vs FPKFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FPKFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FPKFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FPKFX (2.35B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FPKFX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FPKFX (1.63). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FPKFX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FPKFX (7 years). CLBFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than FPKFX (0.33). FPKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FPKFX (0) vs CLBFX (250). FPKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.75 vs. CLBFX (17.91). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.98 vs. CLBFX (38.25).
| CLBFX | FPKFX | CLBFX / FPKFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.33 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.33 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 9.696 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 2.35B | 11,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.63 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 19.75 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 52.89 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 45.98 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement