Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FSAAX
CLBFX vs FSAAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FSAAX
CLBFX vs FSAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FSAAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FSAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FSAAX (5.61B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FSAAX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FSAAX (1.59). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FSAAX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FSAAX (19 years). FSAAX (0.95) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSAAX (29.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FSAAX (0) vs CLBFX (250). FSAAX (18.59) and CLBFX (17.70) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. FSAAX (28.30).
| CLBFX | FSAAX | CLBFX / FSAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.92 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.95 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.054 | 10.253 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 5.61B | 4,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.70 | 18.59 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.52 | 42.49 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.79 | 28.30 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.12 | 90.16 | 113% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement