Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FSANX
CLBFX vs FSANX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FSANX
CLBFX vs FSANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FSANX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FSANX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSANX (5.61B). CLBFX (1.92) and FSANX (1.84) have matching dividends . CLBFX was incepted earlier than FSANX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FSANX (19 years). CLBFX (0.66) and FSANX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSANX (29.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FSANX (0) vs CLBFX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.33 vs. CLBFX (17.12). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.63 vs. FSANX (31.51).
| CLBFX | FSANX | CLBFX / FSANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.63 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.65 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.827 | 10.428 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.61B | 5,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.84 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | 18.33 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.56 | 35.78 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.63 | 31.51 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.19 | 97.43 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement