Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FSATX
CLBFX vs FSATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FSATX
CLBFX vs FSATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FSATX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and FSATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSATX (5.61B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FSATX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FSATX (1.37). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FSATX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FSATX (19 years). FSATX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSATX (29.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FSATX (0) vs CLBFX (250). FSATX (14.14) and CLBFX (13.80) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.51 vs. FSATX (24.49).
| CLBFX | FSATX | CLBFX / FSATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.20 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.964 | 9.064 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.61B | 5,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.37 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.80 | 14.14 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.39 | 39.02 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.51 | 24.49 | 153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.69 | 87.75 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement