Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FSATX
CLBFX vs FSATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FSATX
CLBFX vs FSATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FSATX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FSATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FSATX (5.61B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FSATX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FSATX (1.37). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FSATX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FSATX (19 years). FSATX (1.20) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSATX (29.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FSATX (0) vs CLBFX (250). FSATX (18.00) and CLBFX (17.91) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. FSATX (27.09).
| CLBFX | FSATX | CLBFX / FSATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.20 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 9.656 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 5.61B | 4,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.37 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 18.00 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 40.79 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 27.09 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 84.75 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement