Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FSCNX
CLBFX vs FSCNX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FSCNX
CLBFX vs FSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FSCNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FSCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FSCNX (5.61B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: CLBFX (1.92) vs FSCNX (0.89). CLBFX was incepted earlier than FSCNX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FSCNX (19 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FSCNX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX (17.91) and FSCNX (17.37) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. FSCNX (23.78).
| CLBFX | FSCNX | CLBFX / FSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.67 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.70 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 9.438 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 5.61B | 4,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.89 | 215% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 17.37 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 38.59 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 23.78 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 78.53 | 129% |