Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs HDOGX
CLBFX vs HDOGX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs HDOGX
CLBFX vs HDOGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. HDOGX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and HDOGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. HDOGX (49.3M). HDOGX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: HDOGX (2.10) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than HDOGX: CLBFX (24 years) vs HDOGX (28 years). HDOGX (3.25) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. HDOGX (35.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HDOGX: CLBFX (250) vs HDOGX (2500). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. HDOGX (11.49). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. HDOGX (19.72).
| CLBFX | HDOGX | CLBFX / HDOGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 3.25 | 20% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 3.25 | 20% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 3.330 | 294% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 49.3M | 565,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 11.49 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 26.97 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 19.72 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 33.37 | 305% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers