Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs ICMVX
CLBFX vs ICMVX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs ICMVX
CLBFX vs ICMVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. ICMVX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and ICMVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. ICMVX (116M). ICMVX (1.93) and CLBFX (1.92) have matching dividends . CLBFX was incepted earlier than ICMVX: CLBFX (24 years) vs ICMVX (16 years). ICMVX (1.48) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. ICMVX (47.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ICMVX: CLBFX (250) vs ICMVX (250000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. ICMVX (16.12). ICMVX return over 5 years is better than : 41.56 vs. CLBFX (38.25).
| CLBFX | ICMVX | CLBFX / ICMVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.16 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.48 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 4.084 | 240% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 116M | 240,517% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.93 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 16.12 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 51.04 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 41.56 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 70.65 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers