Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs LOGBX
CLBFX vs LOGBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs LOGBX
CLBFX vs LOGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. LOGBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and LOGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. LOGBX (49.9M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than LOGBX: CLBFX (1.92) vs LOGBX (0.54). CLBFX was incepted earlier than LOGBX: CLBFX (24 years) vs LOGBX (10 years). LOGBX (1.41) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. LOGBX (29.46). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LOGBX: CLBFX (250) vs LOGBX (10000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. LOGBX (9.37). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. LOGBX (5.58).
| CLBFX | LOGBX | CLBFX / LOGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.20 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.41 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 3.700 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 10000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 49.9M | 559,118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.54 | 359% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 9.37 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 21.00 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 5.58 | 686% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 42.75 | 238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement