Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs MAPOX
CLBFX vs MAPOX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs MAPOX
CLBFX vs MAPOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. MAPOX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and MAPOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MAPOX (655M). MAPOX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: MAPOX (2.11) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than MAPOX: CLBFX (24 years) vs MAPOX (65 years). MAPOX (0.72) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MAPOX (13.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MAPOX: CLBFX (250) vs MAPOX (2500). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. MAPOX (10.01). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. MAPOX (11.14).
| CLBFX | MAPOX | CLBFX / MAPOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.72 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.72 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 3.510 | 279% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 655M | 42,595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.11 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 10.01 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 27.18 | 170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 11.14 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 65.53 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers