Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs MBNAX
CLBFX vs MBNAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs MBNAX
CLBFX vs MBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. MBNAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and MBNAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MBNAX (442M). CLBFX (1.92) and MBNAX (1.88) have matching dividends . CLBFX was incepted earlier than MBNAX: CLBFX (24 years) vs MBNAX (22 years). MBNAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). MBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBNAX: CLBFX (250) vs MBNAX (15000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. MBNAX (7.98). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. MBNAX (-0.56).
| CLBFX | MBNAX | CLBFX / MBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.05 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.07 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 4.700 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 442M | 65,158% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.88 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.85 | 7.98 | 211% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 23.52 | 191% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.93 | -0.56 | -6,973% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.85 | 21.24 | 494% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement