Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs MBNAX
CLBFX vs MBNAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs MBNAX
CLBFX vs MBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. MBNAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and MBNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MBNAX (445M). CLBFX (1.92) and MBNAX (1.88) have matching dividends . CLBFX was incepted earlier than MBNAX: CLBFX (24 years) vs MBNAX (22 years). MBNAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). MBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBNAX: CLBFX (250) vs MBNAX (15000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. MBNAX (8.88). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. MBNAX (-1.72).
| CLBFX | MBNAX | CLBFX / MBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.05 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.07 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 4.860 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 445M | 62,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.88 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 8.88 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 23.53 | 196% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | -1.72 | -2,225% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 19.70 | 516% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement