Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs MSFFX
CLBFX vs MSFFX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs MSFFX
CLBFX vs MSFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. MSFFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and MSFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MSFFX (7.45B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than MSFFX: CLBFX (1.92) vs MSFFX (1.73). CLBFX was incepted earlier than MSFFX: CLBFX (24 years) vs MSFFX (21 years). MSFFX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFFX (41.00). MSFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: MSFFX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. MSFFX (4.34). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. MSFFX (-5.63).
| CLBFX | MSFFX | CLBFX / MSFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 2.615 | 374% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 7.45B | 3,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.73 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 4.34 | 413% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 11.04 | 418% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | -5.63 | -679% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 25.19 | 403% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement