Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs MSFFX
CLBFX vs MSFFX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs MSFFX
CLBFX vs MSFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. MSFFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and MSFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MSFFX (7.36B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than MSFFX: CLBFX (1.92) vs MSFFX (1.73). CLBFX was incepted earlier than MSFFX: CLBFX (24 years) vs MSFFX (21 years). MSFFX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFFX (41.00). MSFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: MSFFX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. MSFFX (3.10). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. MSFFX (-4.70).
| CLBFX | MSFFX | CLBFX / MSFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 2.091 | 452% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.36B | 3,911% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.73 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.85 | 3.10 | 543% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 9.59 | 469% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.93 | -4.70 | -828% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.85 | 26.68 | 393% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement