Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs MSFRX
CLBFX vs MSFRX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs MSFRX
CLBFX vs MSFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. MSFRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and MSFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MSFRX (7.36B). MSFRX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: MSFRX (2.43) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than MSFRX: CLBFX (24 years) vs MSFRX (56 years). MSFRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFRX (41.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFRX: CLBFX (250) vs MSFRX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. MSFRX (3.98). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. MSFRX (-0.97).
| CLBFX | MSFRX | CLBFX / MSFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.72 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.72 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 2.505 | 377% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.36B | 3,911% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.43 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.85 | 3.98 | 424% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 12.18 | 369% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.93 | -0.97 | -3,998% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.85 | 36.74 | 285% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement