Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs MSFRX
CLBFX vs MSFRX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs MSFRX
CLBFX vs MSFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. MSFRX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and MSFRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MSFRX (7.45B). MSFRX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: MSFRX (2.43) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than MSFRX: CLBFX (24 years) vs MSFRX (56 years). MSFRX (0.72) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFRX (41.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFRX: CLBFX (250) vs MSFRX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. MSFRX (5.17). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. MSFRX (-1.95).
| CLBFX | MSFRX | CLBFX / MSFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.72 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.72 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 2.977 | 329% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 7.45B | 3,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.43 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 5.17 | 347% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 13.66 | 338% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | -1.95 | -1,965% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 35.07 | 290% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement