Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs MTRBX
CLBFX vs MTRBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs MTRBX
CLBFX vs MTRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. MTRBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and MTRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MTRBX (7.36B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than MTRBX: CLBFX (1.92) vs MTRBX (1.66). CLBFX was incepted earlier than MTRBX: CLBFX (24 years) vs MTRBX (33 years). MTRBX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MTRBX (41.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTRBX: CLBFX (250) vs MTRBX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. MTRBX (3.18). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. MTRBX (-4.53).
| CLBFX | MTRBX | CLBFX / MTRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.47 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 2.150 | 439% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.36B | 3,911% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.66 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.85 | 3.18 | 530% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 9.71 | 463% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.93 | -4.53 | -860% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.85 | 26.97 | 389% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers