Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs OAKBX
CLBFX vs OAKBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs OAKBX
CLBFX vs OAKBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. OAKBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and OAKBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. OAKBX (5.91B). OAKBX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: OAKBX (2.19) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than OAKBX: CLBFX (24 years) vs OAKBX (31 years). OAKBX (0.85) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). OAKBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). OAKBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: OAKBX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. OAKBX (7.54). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. OAKBX (17.34).
| CLBFX | OAKBX | CLBFX / OAKBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.85 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.85 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | -0.873 | -1,082% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.91B | 4,872% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.19 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.85 | 7.54 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 32.24 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.93 | 17.34 | 224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.85 | 53.03 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers