Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs PABAX
CLBFX vs PABAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs PABAX
CLBFX vs PABAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. PABAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and PABAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. PABAX (3.17B). PABAX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: PABAX (2.60) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than PABAX: CLBFX (24 years) vs PABAX (32 years). PABAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: PABAX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.70 vs. PABAX (14.49). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. PABAX (11.55).
| CLBFX | PABAX | CLBFX / PABAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.90 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.90 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.054 | 7.472 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 3.17B | 8,804% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.60 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.70 | 14.49 | 122% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.52 | 36.38 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.79 | 11.55 | 327% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.12 | 56.05 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers