Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs PABYX
CLBFX vs PABYX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs PABYX
CLBFX vs PABYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. PABYX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and PABYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. PABYX (3.16B). PABYX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: PABYX (2.79) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than PABYX: CLBFX (24 years) vs PABYX (32 years). CLBFX (0.66) and PABYX (0.65) have similar cost to investors . PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: PABYX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. PABYX (14.58). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. PABYX (13.43).
| CLBFX | PABYX | CLBFX / PABYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.65 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.65 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 7.216 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 3.16B | 8,835% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 14.58 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 36.91 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 13.43 | 285% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 58.83 | 173% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement