Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs PGEMX
CLBFX vs PGEMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs PGEMX
CLBFX vs PGEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. PGEMX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and PGEMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. PGEMX (2.43B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than PGEMX: CLBFX (1.92) vs PGEMX (0.87). CLBFX was incepted earlier than PGEMX: CLBFX (24 years) vs PGEMX (32 years). PGEMX (1.41) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). PGEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). PGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: PGEMX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. PGEMX (14.13). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. PGEMX (27.22).
| CLBFX | PGEMX | CLBFX / PGEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.41 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.41 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 8.336 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 2.43B | 11,477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.87 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 14.13 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 42.45 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 27.22 | 141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 85.29 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement