Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs QABGX
CLBFX vs QABGX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs QABGX
CLBFX vs QABGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. QABGX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and QABGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. QABGX (323M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than QABGX: CLBFX (1.92) vs QABGX (1.13). CLBFX was incepted earlier than QABGX: CLBFX (24 years) vs QABGX (21 years). QABGX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: CLBFX (250) vs QABGX (1500). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.52 vs. QABGX (5.34). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. QABGX (7.03).
| CLBFX | QABGX | CLBFX / QABGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.34 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.35 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.985 | 4.007 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 323M | 89,164% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.13 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.52 | 5.34 | 291% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.58 | 28.09 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.24 | 7.03 | 501% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.00 | 57.31 | 171% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement