Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs QKBGX
CLBFX vs QKBGX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs QKBGX
CLBFX vs QKBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. QKBGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and QKBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. QKBGX (331M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than QKBGX: CLBFX (1.92) vs QKBGX (1.35). CLBFX was incepted earlier than QKBGX: CLBFX (24 years) vs QKBGX (19 years). QKBGX (1.05) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). QKBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). QKBGX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: QKBGX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. QKBGX (8.75). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. QKBGX (12.24).
| CLBFX | QKBGX | CLBFX / QKBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.05 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.05 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 6.391 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 331M | 84,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.35 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | 8.75 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 32.41 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 12.24 | 313% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 64.34 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement