Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs RPBAX
CLBFX vs RPBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs RPBAX
CLBFX vs RPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. RPBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and RPBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. RPBAX (5.29B). RPBAX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: RPBAX (2.05) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than RPBAX: CLBFX (24 years) vs RPBAX (87 years). CLBFX (0.66) and RPBAX (0.66) have similar cost to investors . CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RPBAX (43.70). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPBAX: CLBFX (250) vs RPBAX (2500). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. RPBAX (11.97). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. RPBAX (12.99).
| CLBFX | RPBAX | CLBFX / RPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.61 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.66 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 87 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 6.485 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.29B | 5,445% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.05 | 94% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.85 | 11.97 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | 32.66 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.93 | 12.99 | 300% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.85 | 68.25 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers