Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs SCORX
CLBFX vs SCORX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs SCORX
CLBFX vs SCORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. SCORX commentary
Jun 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and SCORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. SCORX (43.5M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than SCORX: CLBFX (1.92) vs SCORX (1.42). CLBFX was incepted earlier than SCORX: CLBFX (24 years) vs SCORX (19 years). SCORX (0.84) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. SCORX (16.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCORX: CLBFX (250) vs SCORX (1000). SCORX (17.50) and CLBFX (17.12) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.63 vs. SCORX (36.93).
| CLBFX | SCORX | CLBFX / SCORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.75 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.84 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.827 | 7.883 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 43.5M | 662,069% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.42 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | 17.50 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.56 | 34.56 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.63 | 36.93 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.19 | 88.34 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement