Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs SQCBX
CLBFX vs SQCBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs SQCBX
CLBFX vs SQCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. SQCBX commentary
Jul 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and SQCBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. SQCBX (104M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than SQCBX: CLBFX (1.92) vs SQCBX (1.74). CLBFX was incepted earlier than SQCBX: CLBFX (24 years) vs SQCBX (7 years). SQCBX (2.64) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. SQCBX (9.70). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SQCBX: CLBFX (250) vs SQCBX (5000). SQCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.36 vs. CLBFX (12.47). SQCBX (36.49) and CLBFX (36.21) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBFX | SQCBX | CLBFX / SQCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.64 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.64 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.964 | 8.982 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 104M | 276,923% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.74 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.47 | 15.36 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.39 | 44.65 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.21 | 36.49 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.55 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement