Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs SQCBX
CLBFX vs SQCBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs SQCBX
CLBFX vs SQCBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. SQCBX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and SQCBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. SQCBX (103M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than SQCBX: CLBFX (1.92) vs SQCBX (1.73). CLBFX was incepted earlier than SQCBX: CLBFX (24 years) vs SQCBX (7 years). SQCBX (2.64) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. SQCBX (9.70). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than SQCBX: CLBFX (250) vs SQCBX (5000). SQCBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.60 vs. CLBFX (16.08). SQCBX (39.52) and CLBFX (39.46) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBFX | SQCBX | CLBFX / SQCBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.64 | 25% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.64 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.910 | 8.982 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 103M | 279,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.73 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | 18.60 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.85 | 45.69 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.46 | 39.52 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement