Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs TBLRX
CLBFX vs TBLRX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs TBLRX
CLBFX vs TBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. TBLRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and TBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. TBLRX (72.3M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than TBLRX: CLBFX (1.92) vs TBLRX (1.24). CLBFX was incepted earlier than TBLRX: CLBFX (24 years) vs TBLRX (32 years). TBLRX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). TBLRX (52.00) and CLBFX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. TBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: TBLRX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. TBLRX (-9.09). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. TBLRX (-13.91).
| CLBFX | TBLRX | CLBFX / TBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.10 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.23 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 5.631 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 72.3M | 385,892% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.24 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | -9.09 | -197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | -0.28 | -16,325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | -13.91 | -275% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | 17.28 | 588% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement