Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs TCSHX
CLBFX vs TCSHX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs TCSHX
CLBFX vs TCSHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. TCSHX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and TCSHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. TCSHX (896M). TCSHX pays higher dividends than CLBFX: TCSHX (2.38) vs CLBFX (1.92). CLBFX was incepted earlier than TCSHX: CLBFX (24 years) vs TCSHX (12 years). TCSHX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). TCSHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCSHX: CLBFX (250) vs TCSHX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.70 vs. TCSHX (16.84). CLBFX (37.79) and TCSHX (36.43) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBFX | TCSHX | CLBFX / TCSHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.69 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.69 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.054 | 4.665 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 896M | 31,138% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 2.38 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.70 | 16.84 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.52 | 45.32 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.79 | 36.43 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.12 | 111.85 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement