Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs TMAIX
CLBFX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs TMAIX
CLBFX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. TMAIX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. TMAIX (4.48B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than TMAIX: CLBFX (1.92) vs TMAIX (1.67). CLBFX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: CLBFX (24 years) vs TMAIX (21 years). TMAIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX (50.00) and TMAIX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: CLBFX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.08 vs. TMAIX (11.45). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.46 vs. TMAIX (19.83).
| CLBFX | TMAIX | CLBFX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.86 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.06 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.910 | 5.957 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 4.48B | 6,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.67 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | 11.45 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.85 | 30.31 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.46 | 19.83 | 199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.25 | 68.14 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement