Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WBCCX
CLBFX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$36.92
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.99B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.65
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.38M
CLBFX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WBCCX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and WBCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. WBCCX (33.4M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: CLBFX (1.97) vs WBCCX (0.50). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: CLBFX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.57 vs. WBCCX (1.59). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.52 vs. WBCCX (-3.96).
| CLBFX | WBCCX | CLBFX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.14 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.14 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.669 | 4.203 | 206% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 253B | 33.4M | 757,485% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 0.50 | 395% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.57 | 1.59 | 730% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.58 | 3.34 | 975% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.52 | -3.96 | -998% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.50 | -12.58 | -632% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement