Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WBCCX
CLBFX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WBCCX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$38.26
Change-$0.17 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.26B
TETON Westwood Balanced C
Price$10.81
Change-$0.04 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.92M
CLBFX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WBCCX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and WBCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. WBCCX (33.9M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: CLBFX (1.94) vs WBCCX (0.49). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WBCCX (24 years). WBCCX (2.14) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WBCCX (36.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: CLBFX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.92 vs. WBCCX (-1.37). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.68 vs. WBCCX (-0.04).
| CLBFX | WBCCX | CLBFX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.14 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.14 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.614 | 6.061 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 263B | 33.9M | 775,811% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 0.49 | 393% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.92 | -1.37 | -578% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.39 | 16.02 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.68 | -0.04 | -130,928% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.98 | -5.29 | -1,872% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement