Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WBCCX
CLBFX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WBCCX
CLBFX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WBCCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and WBCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. WBCCX (31M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: CLBFX (1.92) vs WBCCX (0.32). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: CLBFX (24 years) vs WBCCX (25 years). WBCCX (2.18) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). WBCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: CLBFX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. WBCCX (-1.32). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. WBCCX (-16.58).
| CLBFX | WBCCX | CLBFX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.18 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 2.18 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 4.313 | 227% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 31M | 900,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.32 | 606% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | -1.32 | -1,357% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 5.32 | 868% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | -16.58 | -231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | -12.04 | -844% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement