Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WEBAX
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WEBAX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$34.76
Change-$0.39 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.4B
TETON Westwood Balanced AAA
Price$9.92
Change-$0.12 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.3M
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WEBAX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and WEBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. WEBAX (33.3M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: CLBFX (2.15) vs WEBAX (1.26). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: CLBFX (23 years) vs WEBAX (34 years). WEBAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.67). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. WEBAX (36.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: CLBFX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. WEBAX (-2.23). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.89 vs. WEBAX (1.65).
| CLBFX | WEBAX | CLBFX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.39 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.962 | 0.590 | 333% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 240B | 33.3M | 720,721% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.15 | 1.26 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | -2.23 | -199% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.32 | 5.17 | 489% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.89 | 1.65 | 2,472% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.61 | -12.06 | -561% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement