Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WEBAX
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WEBAX
CLBFX vs WEBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WEBAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and WEBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. WEBAX (31M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WEBAX: CLBFX (1.92) vs WEBAX (1.07). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WEBAX: CLBFX (24 years) vs WEBAX (35 years). WEBAX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). WEBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. CLBFX (50.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WEBAX: CLBFX (250) vs WEBAX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.91 vs. WEBAX (-0.64). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. WEBAX (-13.72).
| CLBFX | WEBAX | CLBFX / WEBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.43 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.43 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.786 | 4.732 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 31M | 900,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.07 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.91 | -0.64 | -2,807% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.17 | 7.66 | 603% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | -13.72 | -279% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.63 | -6.21 | -1,636% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement