Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WFALX
CLBFX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WFALX
CLBFX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WFALX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and WFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFALX (1.22B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WFALX: CLBFX (1.92) vs WFALX (0.52). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WFALX: CLBFX (24 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.83) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFALX (19.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: CLBFX (250) vs WFALX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.85 vs. WFALX (-6.46). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.93 vs. WFALX (-26.25).
| CLBFX | WFALX | CLBFX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.82 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.83 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.449 | 5.699 | 166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 0.52 | 372% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.85 | -6.46 | -261% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.94 | -15.35 | -293% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.93 | -26.25 | -148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.85 | 12.25 | 856% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement