Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WFATX
CLBFX vs WFATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WFATX
CLBFX vs WFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WFATX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and WFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFATX (1.22B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WFATX: CLBFX (1.92) vs WFATX (1.18). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WFATX: CLBFX (24 years) vs WFATX (10 years). WFATX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFATX (19.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFATX: CLBFX (250) vs WFATX (1000000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. WFATX (3.91). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.14 vs. WFATX (-3.03).
| CLBFX | WFATX | CLBFX / WFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.75 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.76 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.738 | 5.555 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.18 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 3.91 | 385% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.29 | 10.16 | 426% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.14 | -3.03 | -1,195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.76 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers