Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs WMBLX
CLBFX vs WMBLX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs WMBLX
CLBFX vs WMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. WMBLX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and WMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WMBLX (103M). CLBFX pays higher dividends than WMBLX: CLBFX (1.92) vs WMBLX (1.52). CLBFX was incepted earlier than WMBLX: CLBFX (24 years) vs WMBLX (28 years). WMBLX (1.29) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMBLX (22.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMBLX: CLBFX (250) vs WMBLX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. WMBLX (12.46). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.14 vs. WMBLX (7.15).
| CLBFX | WMBLX | CLBFX / WMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.29 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.29 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.738 | 8.756 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 103M | 279,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.52 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 12.46 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.29 | 17.72 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.14 | 7.15 | 505% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.76 | 43.34 | 232% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers