Advertisement
CLBT vs NTWK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBT is a Buy and NTWK is a Hold.
| CLBT | NTWK | CLBT / NTWK | |
| Capitalization | 2.82B | 47.5M | 5,943% |
| EBITDA | 103M | 8.98M | 1,147% |
| Gain YTD | -37.715 | 32.013 | -118% |
| P/E Ratio | 48.83 | 26.67 | 183% |
| Revenue | 514M | 72.1M | 713% |
| Total Cash | 443M | 14.7M | 3,014% |
| Total Debt | 23.2M | 9.34M | 249% |
CLBT | NTWK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 63 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NTWK's Valuation (49) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLBT (54) in the null industry. This means that NTWK’s stock grew similarly to CLBT’s over the last 12 months.
CLBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as NTWK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLBT’s stock grew similarly to NTWK’s over the last 12 months.
CLBT's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as NTWK (83) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLBT’s stock grew similarly to NTWK’s over the last 12 months.
NTWK's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLBT (83) in the null industry. This means that NTWK’s stock grew similarly to CLBT’s over the last 12 months.
CLBT's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTWK (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLBT’s stock grew significantly faster than NTWK’s over the last 12 months.
| CLBT | NTWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 78% | 25 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while NTWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CLBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NTWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLBT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NTWK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLBT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NTWK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CLBT (@Computer Communications) experienced а -1.92% price change this week, while NTWK (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.57%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLBT is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
NTWK is expected to report earnings on Oct 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-3.13% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-4.16% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HYP | 27.29 | 0.60 | +2.25% |
| Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | |||
| BUXX | 20.21 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
| Strive Enhanced Income Short MaturityETF | |||
| CZAR | 33.01 | N/A | N/A |
| Themes ETF Trust Themes Natural Monopoly ETF | |||
| PFO | 8.96 | N/A | N/A |
| Flaherty & Crumrine Preferred and Income Opportunity Fund | |||
| KYN | 14.84 | -0.02 | -0.13% |
| Kayne Anderson Energy Infrastructure Fund | |||
CLBT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLBT has been loosely correlated with PEGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLBT jumps, then PEGA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLBT | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| PEGA - CLBT | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| TTD - CLBT | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.65% | ||
| OKTA - CLBT | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.69% | ||
| TEAM - CLBT | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| DDOG - CLBT | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||
NTWK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTWK and WIX have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTWK and WIX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTWK | 100% | N/A | ||
| WIX - NTWK | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| TTD - NTWK | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.65% | ||
| CPAY - NTWK | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| CLBT - NTWK | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
| ASUR - NTWK | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
More | ||||