CLF
Price
$11.32
Change
-$0.15 (-1.31%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.4B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MSB
Price
$18.90
Change
-$0.20 (-1.05%)
Updated
Oct 2 closing price
Capitalization
261.88M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs MSB

CLF vs MSB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. MSB commentary
Oct 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a StrongBuy and MSB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs MSB: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
MSB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7978
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9431
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4686
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
37n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSB's Valuation (10) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (71). This means that MSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (100). This means that MSB’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's SMR Rating (31) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (94). This means that MSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSB (86). This means that CLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSB’s over the last 12 months.

MSB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (3). This means that MSB’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFMSB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CLF: $11.32 vs. MSB: $18.90)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. MSB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 94% vs. MSB: 98%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $6.4B vs. MSB: $261.88M
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $6.4B. MSB’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $261.88M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $5K to $55.47B. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $10.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while MSB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MSB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MSB is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than MSB.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а -7.06% price change this week, while MSB (@Steel) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-0.27% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

View a ticker or compare two or three
CLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MSB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BBJP79.651.24
+1.58%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP)
FFOX28.790.36
+1.27%
Fundx Future Fund Opportunities ETF
RGEF35.500.39
+1.11%
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF (RGEF)
VPX31.570.23
+0.74%
Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF (VPX)
DDTA21.00N/A
N/A
Innovator Equity Dual Directional 10 Buffer ETF - April (DDTA)

MSB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSB and ASTL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSB and ASTL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSB
1D Price
Change %
MSB100%
-1.05%
ASTL - MSB
26%
Poorly correlated
+5.60%
CMC - MSB
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
TX - MSB
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
CLF - MSB
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
MT - MSB
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
More