CLF
Price
$10.49
Change
+$0.05 (+0.48%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.16B
58 days until earnings call
MT
Price
$33.92
Change
-$0.08 (-0.24%)
Updated
Aug 25, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.28B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs MT

Header iconCLF vs MT Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs MTBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$10.49
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
Volume$123.8K
Capitalization5.16B
ArcelorMittal
Price$33.92
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
Volume$5.74K
Capitalization25.28B
CLF vs MT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. MT commentary
Aug 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Hold and MT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $10.44 vs. MT: $34.00)
Brand notoriety: CLF and MT are both notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 82% vs. MT: 78%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $5.16B vs. MT: $25.28B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $5.16B. MT’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $25.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MT is a better buy in the short-term than CLF.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while MT (@Steel) price change was +1.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +6.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+6.09% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MT($25.3B) has a higher market cap than CLF($5.17B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than MT: CLF (145.67) vs MT (10.37). MT YTD gains are higher at: 48.310 vs. CLF (11.064). MT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.49B vs. CLF (-430M). MT has more cash in the bank: 5.36B vs. CLF (61M). CLF has less debt than MT: CLF (7.73B) vs MT (13.7B). MT has higher revenues than CLF: MT (60.6B) vs CLF (18.5B).
CLFMTCLF / MT
Capitalization5.17B25.3B20%
EBITDA-430M4.49B-10%
Gain YTD11.06448.31023%
P/E Ratio145.6710.371,405%
Revenue18.5B60.6B31%
Total Cash61M5.36B1%
Total Debt7.73B13.7B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs MT: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
MT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8432
SMR RATING
1..100
9638
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
391
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MT's Valuation (14) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (90). This means that MT’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (84). This means that MT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

MT's SMR Rating (38) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (96). This means that MT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

MT's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (49). This means that MT’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for MT (91). This means that CLF’s stock grew significantly faster than MT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRMVX28.850.76
+2.71%
Harbor Mid Cap Value Admin
PLVJX20.030.38
+1.93%
Principal Large Cap Value III J
MEIGX51.560.72
+1.42%
MFS Value R1
EVDAX21.570.17
+0.79%
Camelot Event Driven A
MLPGX7.020.02
+0.29%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha C

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
+3.67%
STLD - CLF
73%
Closely correlated
+5.50%
NUE - CLF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.27%
CMC - CLF
65%
Loosely correlated
+4.64%
RS - CLF
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.04%
ZEUS - CLF
58%
Loosely correlated
+5.57%
More