CLF
Price
$10.57
Change
+$0.08 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:38 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.06B
24 days until earnings call
MTUS
Price
$15.27
Change
+$0.08 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:29 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
648.04M
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLF vs MTUS

Header iconCLF vs MTUS Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs MTUSBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$10.57
Change+$0.08 (+0.76%)
Volume$9K
Capitalization5.06B
Metallus
Price$15.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
Volume$100
Capitalization648.04M
CLF vs MTUS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. MTUS commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a StrongBuy and MTUS is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $10.49 vs. MTUS: $15.19)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. MTUS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 70% vs. MTUS: 54%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $5.06B vs. MTUS: $648.04M
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $5.06B. MTUS’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $648.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $29.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTUS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MTUS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MTUS is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTUS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MTUS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLF and MTUS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а +5.43% price change this week, while MTUS (@Steel) price change was +2.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +6.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2025.

MTUS is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+6.28% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($5.06B) has a higher market cap than MTUS($648M). CLF has higher P/E ratio than MTUS: CLF (145.67) vs MTUS (28.66). CLF YTD gains are higher at: 11.596 vs. MTUS (7.502). CLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 745M vs. MTUS (90M). MTUS has more cash in the bank: 255M vs. CLF (39M). MTUS has less debt than CLF: MTUS (24.8M) vs CLF (3.77B). CLF has higher revenues than MTUS: CLF (20B) vs MTUS (1.17B).
CLFMTUSCLF / MTUS
Capitalization5.06B648M781%
EBITDA745M90M828%
Gain YTD11.5967.502155%
P/E Ratio145.6728.66508%
Revenue20B1.17B1,706%
Total Cash39M255M15%
Total Debt3.77B24.8M15,218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs MTUS: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
MTUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2118
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8353
SMR RATING
1..100
9185
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6356
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
238
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MTUS's Valuation (82) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (89). This means that MTUS’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

MTUS's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (83). This means that MTUS’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

MTUS's SMR Rating (85) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (91). This means that MTUS’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

MTUS's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (63). This means that MTUS’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTUS (38). This means that CLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTUS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFMTUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UWM44.540.87
+1.99%
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
FPXI51.060.67
+1.33%
First Trust International Eq Opps ETF
GAMR68.650.78
+1.15%
Amplify Video Game Leaders ETF
FXO57.240.48
+0.85%
First Trust Financials AlphaDEX® ETF
HAPY24.480.04
+0.16%
Harbor Human Capital Factor Uncons ETF

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
+2.34%
NUE - CLF
76%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
STLD - CLF
70%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
CMC - CLF
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
RS - CLF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
MTUS - CLF
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
More

MTUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTUS has been loosely correlated with CMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTUS jumps, then CMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTUS
1D Price
Change %
MTUS100%
-0.39%
CMC - MTUS
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.84%
ZEUS - MTUS
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.07%
RYI - MTUS
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
RS - MTUS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.36%
NUE - MTUS
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
More