CLF
Price
$10.27
Change
-$0.15 (-1.44%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
5.07B
20 days until earnings call
RS
Price
$288.06
Change
+$3.78 (+1.33%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
15.59B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLF vs RS

Header iconCLF vs RS Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs RSBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$10.27
Change-$0.15 (-1.44%)
Volume$7.94M
Capitalization5.07B
Reliance
Price$288.06
Change+$3.78 (+1.33%)
Volume$499.64K
Capitalization15.59B
CLF vs RS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. RS commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Hold and RS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $10.27 vs. RS: $288.06)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. RS: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 52% vs. RS: 112%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $5.07B vs. RS: $15.59B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $5.07B. RS’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $15.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $29.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, RS is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than RS.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а +3.74% price change this week, while RS (@Steel) price change was +7.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

RS is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+1.98% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RS($15.6B) has a higher market cap than CLF($5.07B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than RS: CLF (145.67) vs RS (15.77). CLF YTD gains are higher at: 9.255 vs. RS (6.982). RS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.74B vs. CLF (745M). RS has more cash in the bank: 315M vs. CLF (39M). RS has less debt than CLF: RS (1.54B) vs CLF (3.77B). CLF has higher revenues than RS: CLF (20B) vs RS (14B).
CLFRSCLF / RS
Capitalization5.07B15.6B33%
EBITDA745M1.74B43%
Gain YTD9.2556.982133%
P/E Ratio145.6715.77924%
Revenue20B14B143%
Total Cash39M315M12%
Total Debt3.77B1.54B245%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs RS: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
RS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1423
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
859
SMR RATING
1..100
9259
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6455
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RS's Valuation (14) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (89). This means that RS’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

RS's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (85). This means that RS’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

RS's SMR Rating (59) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (92). This means that RS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

RS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (64). This means that RS’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is in the same range as RS (28). This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to RS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFRS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDM99.181.45
+1.48%
ProShares Ultra Dow30
SOLR25.050.17
+0.69%
SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF
OAIM32.260.07
+0.23%
OneAscent International Equity ETF
VNLA48.970.05
+0.10%
Janus Henderson Short Duration Inc ETF
LCF36.50N/A
N/A
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
-1.44%
NUE - CLF
75%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
STLD - CLF
70%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
CMC - CLF
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
RS - CLF
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
RDUS - CLF
52%
Loosely correlated
+5.38%
More

RS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RS has been closely correlated with CMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RS jumps, then CMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RS
1D Price
Change %
RS100%
+1.33%
CMC - RS
71%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
STLD - RS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
NUE - RS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
ZEUS - RS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
MTUS - RS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More