CLFD vs PI
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLFD is a Hold and PI is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLFD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CLFD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLFD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CLFD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CLFD (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -7.63% price change this week, while PI (@Semiconductors) price change was -0.72% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -3.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.54%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.49%.
Reported Earning Dates
CLFD is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
PI is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Telecommunications Equipment (-3.45% weekly)The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
@Semiconductors (-3.04% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| CLFD | PI | CLFD / PI | |
| Capitalization | 454M | 4.22B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 24.6M | 46M | 53% |
| Gain YTD | 3.645 | 66.500 | 5% |
| P/E Ratio | 37.60 | 162.93 | 23% |
| Revenue | 217M | 345M | 63% |
| Total Cash | 163M | 170M | 96% |
| Total Debt | 19.5M | 293M | 7% |
CLFD | PI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 28 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CLFD's Valuation (63) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PI (95) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to PI’s over the last 12 months.
PI's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (79) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that PI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
PI's SMR Rating (28) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLFD (90) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that PI’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLFD’s over the last 12 months.
CLFD's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as PI (62) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew similarly to PI’s over the last 12 months.
CLFD's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for PI (98) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that CLFD’s stock grew significantly faster than PI’s over the last 12 months.
| CLFD | PI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 82% |
CLFD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLFD has been loosely correlated with ZBRA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLFD jumps, then ZBRA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CLFD | 100% | -1.15% | ||
| ZBRA - CLFD | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| KN - CLFD | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| DGII - CLFD | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.56% | ||
| BDC - CLFD | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| CIEN - CLFD | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
More | ||||