Ad is loading...
CLGCF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
ODV
Price
$1.41
Change
-$0.06 (-4.08%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CLGCF vs ODV

Header iconCLGCF vs ODV Comparison
Open Charts CLGCF vs ODVBanner chart's image
Clarity Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$784
CapitalizationN/A
Osisko Development
Price$1.41
Change-$0.06 (-4.08%)
Volume$180.18K
CapitalizationN/A
CLGCF vs ODV Comparison Chart
Loading...
ODV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLGCF vs. ODV commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGCF is a Hold and ODV is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CLGCF: $0.03 vs. ODV: $1.41)
Brand notoriety: CLGCF and ODV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLGCF: 3% vs. ODV: 61%
Market capitalization -- CLGCF: $2.47M vs. ODV: $179.3M
CLGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.47M. ODV’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $179.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileODV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ODV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ODV is a better buy in the long-term than CLGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ODV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ODV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CLGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.23% price change this week, while ODV (@Precious Metals) price change was -17.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.07% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ODV($179M) has a higher market cap than CLGCF($2.47M). CLGCF YTD gains are higher at: -16.857 vs. ODV (-51.546). CLGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.63M vs. ODV (-85.5M). ODV has more cash in the bank: 71.5M vs. CLGCF (184K). CLGCF has less debt than ODV: CLGCF (0) vs ODV (19.7M). ODV has higher revenues than CLGCF: ODV (43.9M) vs CLGCF (0).
CLGCFODVCLGCF / ODV
Capitalization2.47M179M1%
EBITDA-3.63M-85.5M4%
Gain YTD-16.857-51.54633%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue043.9M-
Total Cash184K71.5M0%
Total Debt019.7M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ODV: Fundamental Ratings
ODV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ODV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ODV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CEMDX12.47-0.07
-0.56%
Cullen Emerging Markets High Div Retail
PUVCX39.06-0.28
-0.71%
Putnam International Capital Opp C
KESGX16.47-0.17
-1.02%
Kennedy Capital ESG SMID Cap I
JGRCX121.12-1.52
-1.24%
Janus Henderson Enterprise C
TWIEX12.32-0.19
-1.52%
American Century International Gr Inv

CLGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLGCF and XXMMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLGCF and XXMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLGCF
1D Price
Change %
CLGCF100%
-8.20%
XXMMF - CLGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-20.30%
FTCO - CLGCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
ODV - CLGCF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
PPTA - CLGCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+16.48%
TIHRF - CLGCF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ODV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ODV has been loosely correlated with GORO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ODV jumps, then GORO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ODV
1D Price
Change %
ODV100%
-4.08%
GORO - ODV
47%
Loosely correlated
-7.71%
DOLLF - ODV
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
NEM - ODV
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
MTA - ODV
38%
Loosely correlated
-7.17%
NFGC - ODV
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.59%
More